Threat and Defense as Goal Regulation: From Implicit Goal Conflict to Anxious Uncertainty, Reactive

Publication year: 2011
Source: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Volume 101, Issue 6, December 2011, Pages 1291-1301
Kyle Nash, Ian McGregor, Mike Prentice
Four studies investigated a goal regulation view of anxious uncertainty threat (Gray & McNaughton, 2000) and ideological defense. Participants (N= 444) were randomly assigned to have achievement or relationship goals implicitly primed. The implicit goal primes were followed by randomly assigned achievement or relationship threats that have reliably caused generalized, reactive approach motivation and ideological defense in past research. The threats caused anxious uncertainty (Study 1), reactive approach motivation (Studies 2 and 3), and reactive ideological conviction (Study 4) only when threat-relevant goals had first been primed, but not when threat-irrelevant goals had first been primed. Reactive ideological conviction (Study 4) was eliminated if participants were given an opportunity to attribute their anxiety to a mundane source. Results support a goal regulation view of anxious uncertainty, threat, and defense with potential for integrating theories of defensive compensation.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=GatewayURL&_origin=IRSSCONTENT&_method=citationSearch&_piikey=S0022351411601568&_version=1&md5=9da1535f341ec4170157d203bb2bff99

Sent with MobileRSS HD FREE

Júlio Leonardo B. Pereira

http://lattes.cnpq.br/7687651239699170

http://www.neurocirurgiabr.org

http://www.neurocancer.com